The Human Flourishing Academy

Learn the skills to flourish in a changing world

Menu Skip to content

About
Courses and Workshops
Counselling
FAQs
Contact

6th March 201924th March 2019 Dr Carol Schultz

Future Shock: How does future shock influence socialization?

Future Shock: is the point at which people can no longer adapt to change without displaying dysfunctional behavior. (Macionis & Gerber, 2011)

Copyright 2019 Dr Carol Schultz

Feel free to like and comment

https://humanflourishingacademy.com

Share this:

Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn
Email

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Adaptation To Change
Socialization

Published by Dr Carol Schultz

View all posts by Dr Carol Schultz

Post navigation

Previous Change: does it impact sociliazation?

Next Change Demand: how does the change demand influence socialization?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Enter your comment here...

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Email (required) (Address never made public)

Name (required)

Website

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Google account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )

You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Notify me of new comments via email.

Notify me of new posts via email.

Follow Blog via Email

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Email Address:

Categories

Adaptation To Change
community
Core Values
Culture
Life Long Learning
Marginalization
Modern Pressures
Moral Contradictions
Moral Thinking
Socialization
The Individual
Uncategorized
Youth Marginalization

Search for:

Archives

April 2019
March 2019
February 2019

Spam Blocked

65 spam blocked by Akismet

Blog Stats

4,885 hits

Categories

Categories

Tags

Australian Public Schools Australian taxpayers backing ideas behavior behaviour being building urban parks campaign contributions checks and balances children citizens class interests climate change community crime cuture Deborah Glass Dietrich Bonhoeffer disengagement economics education emotional health estimate risk estimate risk empirically federal governments feelings financial bailouts financial crisis fiscal costs Forbes 400 government homelessness individually inequality law enforcement marginalisation in education marginalization in education mental health morality morals moral society NSW Schools partisan goals pedagogies philanthropy poor health private donors psychosocial health public health public welfare dependency quantitative data Queensland Schools relating remaking public education research pilot projects safe environament school exclusions school leaver shape our culture social and fiscal costs social costs social engineering social health spiritual health state governments statistical prediction thinking training underemployment Victorian Ombudsmen work youth youth disengagement in education youth marginalisation Youth Marginalization

Add your thoughts here... (optional) Post to

Cancel

Send to Email Address Your Name Your Email Address

Cancel

Post was not sent - check your email addresses!

Email check failed, please try again

Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy

%d bloggers like this: